Marx's Opinion:-

According to Marx's view, the sense of a man can't determine his social life but his social life determines his sense.

Personal Consciousness as the Product of Social Context:-

In reality, it is difficult to emerge the writers, who can present the great thinking by raising beyond that social context from the community of victims and poor people. As a result, super-structure can't be established so as to be represented their life-feelings and sufferings in actual sense.

Progressive Writers:-

As regards the progressive writers, the following questions will get the satisfactory or correct answer:-




Why is it not suitable for the progressive writers to write the literature, especially, full of sex according to the wishes of people ?
why are those rights, related with bourgeois litrature the products of socio-economic structure of contemporary society ?



In this sense, it is not certainly right to be active to fulfill the aspirations, created by that system, which we want to change because it is not meaningful for the progressive writers to wander the subject-matters like personal obstruction, praise, sadness, Godly marvel and sex etc. Therefore, they must be able to stand in the scientific horizon of reality and behaviour by feeling the cries and challenges of all penniless people.

Group-Struggle for the Fixed Period :-

The literature is not suited to all the time like bourgeois because it is the reflection of group-struggle, concerning the struggle between the rich and the poor for the fixed period of history.

Other Marxist Reviewers:-

Like Karl Marx, there are other commentators. Among them, Makery is also familiarized as a Marxist commentator. He rejects the concept that the writer, who emerges the origin of literature fluently and voluntarily, is the main source of literature for the romantic personale. According to his view, writer is only a producer, who creates a literary work by providing the raw materials like language, tradition, literary genre, idealism and reality etc, available in society and this must be useful for the group-struggle and groupless society or literature is not for literature but for society.

According to American Marxist reviewer, Federick Jonson, politics is unknowingly reflected in literature. Similarly, to the view of Hungarian great thinker, Luckas, literature must reveal the contradictory structure of society in graceful form by means of creative craftsmanship of the writer.

Review of Marxistic Theory :-

The reviewing of Marxist theory has rapidly taken a good shape during the period of some decades. As a result of this, the things like openess, literary analysis, other prevailing critical perspectives and flexibility etc have also started to occupy the space in Marxistic review.

According to the understanding of reviewers of these fields, the theory of Marxistic comment is not a set of realities, suited to all the time but it is the process of developing with the time to some extent or it is the process of clarfying thought, emerged in literature.

Works as the Literary Discussion:-

Indeed Teri Egalton is regarded as one of the notable Marxist reviewers of England. According to his view-point, literary compositions change the contemplative discussion into literary discussion, therefore, literature is extremely proved to be useful to spread thought and achieve political achievements according to the wishes.